• morehuman daily
  • Posts
  • 🧠 Issue #15 – The Case for an AI-less Social Network

🧠 Issue #15 – The Case for an AI-less Social Network

What happens when we log on without the algorithm?

šŸ”„ The Story

A new pattern is emerging in social media. While mainstream platforms continue refining their algorithmic feeds, a growing number of alternatives are taking the opposite approach.

RTRO, an invite-only platform, operates with no algorithmic curation whatsoever. Posts appear in chronological order—exactly when they're made. No optimization, no personalized suggestions, no machine learning deciding what you see.

The result is something that feels closer to early social media: unfiltered, unpredictable, and entirely dependent on timing and chance rather than algorithmic relevance.

šŸ’” The Observation

Two different philosophies are playing out in real time. Traditional platforms optimize for engagement and relevance through AI curation. Newer alternatives like RTRO prioritize chronological authenticity over algorithmic efficiency.

Early users of chronological platforms report some interesting patterns: longer reading sessions, more diverse content discovery, and conversations that develop more organically since replies aren't reordered by engagement metrics.

They also note spending different amounts of time online—sometimes more, sometimes less—but with a different quality of attention.

šŸ”— Curiosity Clicks

  1. 🌐 RTRO launches an algorithm-free social app for friends, creators and brands – TechCrunch explores the platform that's ditching the feed for real-time scrolls

  2. 🧠 New Gen Z-centered app RTRO launches with ChatGPT and focus on messaging – Glossy on RTRO's algorithm-free approach to connecting brands and creators

  3. šŸ“± Slow Social Media: More Thoughts on What a Slow Social Movement Would Mean - Social Media Today explores how "slow social media" prioritizes meaningful content creation over instant engagement

🧭 Worth Trying

If you're curious about the difference, most major platforms offer chronological viewing options in their settings. The contrast in how content appears—and how you interact with it—can be quite noticeable.

šŸ¤” Worth Considering

We're witnessing an interesting split in how digital spaces are designed. Some prioritize algorithmic relevance, others prioritize temporal authenticity. Both approaches have trade-offs, and both seem to be finding their audiences.

More soon, 

— Jesse